Summarize the article:
Kentico or Drupal? Like it or not, the answer to this question is far more complicated than a simple “yes” or “no.” You have to consider your headless delivery and multisite needs, in-house development capacity, and integration requirements; the list goes on.
One thing rings true for both of your options: they require a long-term operational commitment. So, it’s not a choice you can take lightly.
As an experienced provider of CMS migration services, Bits Orchestra has helped many clients pick their new CMS. Here’s your experience-backed guide to key Kentico vs Drupal differences—and when to choose which.
If we had to pick two key Drupal vs Kentico distinctions, it’d be their licensing and tech stack. Drupal is an open-source, self-hosted CMS built on PHP/Symfony. Xperience by Kentico is a proprietary CMS that runs on .NET Core and can be used as a SaaS product or deployed to the cloud of your choice.
Beyond that? Here’s your Kentico-Drupal comparison snapshot of the key differences between the two CMS:
| Category | Kentico | Drupal |
|---|---|---|
Tech stack | .NET Core | PHP/Symfony |
Licensing | Proprietary | Open-source |
Deployment | SaaS or self-hosted/private cloud | Self-hosted |
Headless support | Yes, by default | Yes, through the JSON:API module |
AI capabilities | AIRA for content-related tasks KentiCopilot for integrating your preferred AI coding assistant | Built-in for content management tasks (amazee.ai for free; OpenAI/Anthropic requires a separate LLM account) |
Patch/security model | Vendor-managed patching Shared responsibility security model | Full ownership over patching cadence and security |
Best fit | Multi-brand or multi-site needs Strong governance needs Companies with internal .NET expertise and/or tech stack | Companies that need full architectural ownership and open-source flexibility Companies with internal PHP expertise |
That quick-glance Kentico CMS vs Drupal comparison was the appetizer. Now, let’s move on to the main course and take a deep dive into their key features.
Kentico offers a user-friendly Page Builder that relies on reusable components (widgets) to display on-page content. Before your team can use it, though, a developer has to create customizable widgets first. The Content Hub enables you to reuse and update content across channels.
Drupal stores content as nodes, which are then classified in the website’s taxonomy. Each content category is called a vocabulary, with terms as its subcategories. You can define content types (templates for different content types), fields (structural elements for each content type), and views (dynamic content presentation with filtering/sorting/etc.). Drupal CMS ships with Editoria11y built-in, which checks pages for accessibility and suggests fixes in real time.
Kentico’s editorial governance is quite flexible. You can create your own workflows and decide which page types each workflow applies to. Workflows support multiple steps; you can also define the role that can work with each step.
By default, Drupal CMS has an editorial workflow with predefined steps (Draft, Needs review, Published, Unpublished). You can change that workflow’s steps and set roles and permissions. However, Canvas pages don’t support workflows as of writing.
Kentico’s multisite capabilities are powered by the Content Hub. It allows reusing content across multiple sites, email, and headless channels. However, it has no folder hierarchy; all content is organized in a single list per workspace. That can lead to duplicate uploads and lost assets at scale.
You can also set up a Drupal multisite, define modules for each site, and separate codebases and databases. Drupal uses a multisite folder structure, which enables independent deployments and helps prevent content chaos.
When it comes to Kentico vs Drupal headless CMS capabilities, the hybrid-headless model is one of the key advantages of Kentico CMS. Kentico essentially runs traditional and API delivery in parallel.
However, you need to create endpoints yourself if you can’t use available APIs. Based on our experience in Kentico development services, that can add complexity to development.
Drupal’s core is built around a service-oriented architecture and an event-driven hook system. If you want headless delivery, you’ll have to enable the JSON:API module first. Once it’s done, API endpoints get exposed automatically.
Whether you pick Drupal or Kentico, you may need headless CMS development services to set up the headless architecture.
Kentico offers out-of-the-box integrations, including 6,000+ Zapier integrations, and lets you build your own. Custom integrations have to use .NET, since Xperience runs on this framework, and can involve:
Drupal offers common third-party integrations as community-sourced modules. Drupal’s community-contributed ecosystem is larger, but not all modules are vetted for security or compatibility. Custom integrations can be implemented with:
In either case, you may need CMS integration services to develop custom modules or create custom API connectors or middleware.

You can use Xperience by Kentico as a SaaS product or deploy it to a self-hosted cloud environment:
Self-hosted Kentico: Your team handles designing and deploying the infrastructure, setting up content sync, and configuring access, scaling, and monitoring.
Kentico SaaS: Kentico is responsible for weekly hotfixes, scaling, backups, observability, content sync, and infrastructure setup and management.
Note: You have to update Kentico to keep it on a supported version. Otherwise, you won’t be able to access Kentico’s Support and Consulting.
Drupal CMS ships as a quick-start installer, dubbed Drupal CMS Launcher. It’s a desktop application you can use as a local sandbox. Drupal doesn’t offer a SaaS model, so self-hosted deployment is the only option on the table. Drupal recommends several hosting providers that offer Drupal-optimized hosting and SLAs.
You’ll need a .NET/React development team to update and customize Kentico. React is the second most popular web framework, and .NET is in sixth place. So, your talent pool is likely to be quite large.
Planning to turn to an external partner for Kentico upkeep? Check out our guide on how to choose a Kentico development partner.
Just like Kentico, Drupal requires ongoing upkeep. Drupal runs on PHP/Symfony, but its Drupal CMS offers an intuitive, beginner-friendly site builder. Overall, it’s more suitable for non-technical users compared to raw Drupal, lowering the bar for hires.
Drupal claims its ecosystem counts “100+ Certified Partners and 10k+ professionals.” The 2025 Stack Overflow survey, though, shows that only 2.2% of developers work with Drupal, making for a limited talent pool.
As for support and maintenance, Kentico offers Support and Consulting, but they are version-gated. Besides, some reviews call Kentico’s support somewhat slow. Case in point: “The timeliness of development service/support could be improved” (Gartner).
Since Drupal is an open-source project, support is run by the community via free channels (Slack, issue queues, forums). Contrary to popular belief, community-based support does work and can be quite prompt.
If you’re willing to pay extra, Drupal offers Drupal Steward. It applies zero-day protection rules at the request layer to protect your website before your team can install the actual security patch.
As for updates, keep in mind that Drupal core updates fall under your responsibility. The update UI doesn’t work on all hosting providers, however. For minor and major version updates, you’ll have to use Composer. There can be a noticeable lag between contributed-module updates and the CMS’s own release cadence, which can cause compatibility issues.
Overall, Drupal CMS will be suitable for companies with a PHP/Symfony team. Kentico will be a sounder alternative to Drupal if you already have a .NET team in-house.
On the security front, Kentico is ISO 27001-certified and follows the Secure Development Lifecycle framework. The latter means that Kentico integrates security into every stage of the development and validates feature designs against NIST/OWASP best practices.
Under the SaaS offering, Kentico fully handles backups, infrastructure security, and server configuration—and offers DDoS protection and a WAF. In self-hosted deployments, those are your responsibility; plus, you have to install all updates manually.
As Drupal CMS is self-hosted, expect to handle infrastructure security and backups on your end, too. If Drupal rolls out an emergency security patch, you’ll have to apply it manually via the update UI or Composer. Drupal Steward can protect your website in the meantime if you pay for it. You can also subscribe to an email newsletter with official security advisories to learn about new security issues; it’s free.
Scaling looks different for Kentico depending on the deployment mode:
Drupal CMS doesn’t have a SaaS offering, so scaling setup falls onto your shoulders. That said, Drupal’s recommended hosting providers like Acquia offer dedicated solutions with autoscaling, load balancing, CDN, advanced caching, and more.
Note: Although Drupal CMS could technically be deployed to a first-party managed cloud, that’s an exception rather than a rule.
As for Kentico versus Drupal AI capabilities, both CMS have something to offer. Kentico comes with two AI capabilities to boost team productivity:
Drupal CMS also offers several AI capabilities:
Out of the box, Drupal’s AI features are powered by amazee.ai at no extra cost. You can also integrate OpenAI or Anthropic models, but that requires a separate account and may create extra costs.
Ultimately, the choice boils down to the built-in vs bring-your-own decision. Drupal's AI features run on amazee.ai for free, with OpenAI or Anthropic as bring-your-own upgrades. Kentico's AIRA is bundled and model-agnostic from the start, so there's no separate account to set up if you want to switch providers.
To estimate the true cost of ownership, you need to go well beyond licensing fees and consider implementation and long-term support and maintenance costs.
Here’s our breakdown of the five-year TCO you can expect:
| Area | Xperience by Kentico | Drupal CMS |
|---|---|---|
Licensing | $120,000–$240,000 | $0 |
Implementation | $60,000–$150,000 | $70,000–$180,000 |
Customization and enhancements | $40,000–$90,000 | $50,000–$120,000 |
Support and maintenance | $80,000–$160,000 | $110,000–$260,000 |
TCO over 5 years (estimate) | $300,000–$640,000 | $230,000–$560,000 |
Note: These are our ballpark estimates, nothing more. The final TCO may vary depending on your project’s scope and region, among other things.
While the long-term TCO is important, it’s not the only variable you should account for. Let’s compare Kentico to Drupal based on possible enterprise scenarios:
| Scenario | Bits Orchestra recommends | Why |
|---|---|---|
Multi-brand international business with centralized governance | Kentico | Native multisite and multilingual capabilities, lower editorial overhead |
Re-platforming on a tight budget | Drupal | No licensing fees for the core |
.NET team already in-house | Kentico | .NET/React core |
PHP/Symfony team already in-house | Drupal | PHP/Symfony core |
Complex CRM/ERP integration needs | Depends on the target system | Kentico: Check the current state in the connector catalog Drupal: Check contributed modules for maturity |
AI marketing/dev tools with minimal setup | Kentico | AIRA and KentiCopilot natively bundled |
No in-house ops overhead preferred | Kentico | Kentico handles weekly hotfixes, offers the SaaS shared-responsibility model |
Full ownership over patching/security preferred | Drupal | Self-hosted or hosting provider deployment, Composer updates |
No dedicated technical staff on the payroll | Depends | Kentico: Requires supported version upkeep Drupal: Site builder doesn’t eliminate the need but lowers the bar |
Large third-party ecosystem preferred | Drupal | Larger contributed module catalog than Kentico’s |
Compliance-heavy industry | Kentico | Documented, OWASP/NIST-aligned Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL) |
Ready to pay for a security add-on instead of SDL | Drupal | Drupal Steward available |
Overall, Kentico usually fits companies that:
Drupal is usually a better choice for companies that:
Look into other options if:
The direction of migration (Drupal to Kentico or Kentico to Drupal) will impact your approach and tools used. For example, a Kentico-to-Drupal migration involves creating endpoints and using the GraphQL API to pull structured data from Kentico and feeding it into Drupal via Migrate API and source plugins.
We’ve touched only on the specifics of the Drupal/Kentico migration here. For a more thorough overview of risks and considerations, check out our step-by-step CMS migration guide.
Kentico will be a better Drupal alternative if you run multiple brands or sites and are more comfortable with a shared-responsibility SaaS model. Opt for it if you prefer the vendor to handle weekly patches, scaling, and infrastructure management.
Drupal, on the other hand, is geared toward businesses that can handle technical overhead and fully own architecture and security. Go with it if you prefer the flexibility of the open-source CMS and its large ecosystem, too.
It depends. Kentico will be a better choice for multi-brand/multi-site enterprises that prefer the SaaS model and/or have a .NET team or stack in place. Drupal is more suitable for organizations that can handle full architecture and security ownership.
Yes, but it won’t be easy. There’s no ready-made tool for migrating from Drupal to Kentico, so you’ll probably have to rely on custom scripts. That said, with the right expertise, it’s by no means impossible—and it won’t break your content models or frontend, either.
It depends on your in-house expertise. With Kentico SaaS, the vendor handles common maintenance tasks like weekly patch rollout. Drupal CMS requires manual application of all updates, except for security fixes available through a paid service (Drupal Steward).
Both Kentico and Drupal features can power quality enterprise websites. Ultimately, which platform is better for your website depends on your internal expertise, tech stack, integration needs, and in-house technical capacity.