Bridging the manufacturing skills gap with generative AI is yet another use case that can transform the industry as we know it.
In the United States alone, 55% of manufacturing job openings remain unfilled. What’s more, 71% of manufacturers cite attracting and retaining quality workforce as their biggest challenge.
Across the world, the manufacturing skills gap is growing wider, too. The 2023 Future of Jobs report states that three in 10 European manufacturers encountered production constraints due to a lack of employees.
It’s not a new problem, however. The manufacturing skills gap was called one of the biggest challenges in the U.S. all the way back in 2018.
Lacking the right talent to fill open positions means manufacturers can’t efficiently fulfill orders, ramp up production capabilities to meet the demand, or respond to customer needs in time.
Artificial intelligence, in the form of generative AI, can help manufacturers close that gap. AI adoption is already strong: 89% of manufacturing executives plan to implement the technology. As part of that trend, generative AI for the manufacturing skills gap becomes another frontier in the transition to Industry 5.0.
Leveraging generative AI solutions for the manufacturing skills gap isn’t the only way the technology is reshaping the industry. GenAI use case examples span product design and prototyping, predictive maintenance, quality control, and supply chain optimization.
Product design is the key use case for generative AI in manufacturing, highlighted by Deloitte, Gartner, AWS, McKinsey, and many more. It’s also the leading AI use case in production, according to the fresh MIT Technology Review Insights Survey.
Autodesk, a leading product and project design solution, has already incorporated GenAI capabilities into its software. General Motors already uses GenAI to optimize vehicle parts and reduce vehicles’ weight.
Coupled with digital twin technology, GenAI can create product designs and prototypes based on any number of input variables, including available equipment and raw materials. This speeds up time to market and enhances the business’s agility.
GenAI can also easily solve complex design problems, making it well-positioned for tackling chip design in particular.
Leveraging this use case, however, requires additional generative AI workforce training to ensure your employees can make the most out of the technology. A human in the loop should also be present to verify the output reliability.
Combined with Industrial IoT data and analytical AI/ML, GenAI can aid in monitoring the equipment state and predict when failures become likely. The recommendation system can then schedule maintenance before those failures can occur.
GenAI enhances predictive maintenance systems with step-by-step guidelines and requirements for maintenance, all generated automatically. The technology can also generate instructions for any experience level, allowing relatively inexperienced technicians to complete maintenance. This is one more way how generative AI in manufacturing skills can aid in closing the skill gap.
U.S. Steel, for example, uses MineMind to facilitate equipment maintenance by supplying optimal solutions for present mechanical problems.
As a result, manufacturers can avoid unexpected downtime and reduce maintenance costs with more effective predictive maintenance.
Both computer vision and advanced data analytics are already used to identify defects on the assembly line more accurately than a human could. Generative AI can further augment these quality control tools in three ways:
Combined with advanced analytics, GenAI can boost employee productivity with chat-your-data and report-generating solutions.
For example, instead of scanning through multiple dashboards and spreadsheets, supply chain managers can simply ask when the shipment from XYZ is bound to arrive. The chatbot promptly responds using data from the database.
As a result, supply chain managers can do more without the drudgery of locating the right database entry. This puts the organization one step closer to operational excellence and optimizes costs.
Leveraging generative AI for the manufacturing skills gap isn’t without its challenges, from integrations with existing systems to scalability across operations. Let’s break them down, along with best practices for tackling each challenge.
Challenge | Solutions |
Integrations with existing systems |
|
Lack of quality training data |
|
Scalability across large operations |
|
Output reliability |
|
Technical debt can make integration challenging, as is the case for 45% of manufacturers seeking to adopt AI. To make the most out of GenAI, you need to integrate the new solution with the application stack so that the data can flow back and forth unobstructed in real time.
Integration issues can stem from hastily coded features, outdated technologies, poorly thought-out architecture, unsuitable infrastructure, and more.
GenAI ROI depends heavily on the technology’s use cases, development approaches, and solution quality. Assessing it requires comparing the future person-hours saved against the cost of implementation. We advise you to consider both the qualitative and quantitative impact of GenAI solutions.
If you’d like us to estimate the ROI of your desired GenAI solution, drop us a line.
The implementation roadmap is determined by the AI use cases and the level of the organization’s digital maturity. Therefore, it’s impossible to give a precise answer to this question without knowing anything about your needs and operations.
Don’t hesitate to contact us to discuss how fast we can have your GenAI solution up and running.
Our software development services include maintenance and support. We’ll continue to maintain, update, troubleshoot, and continuously improve your solution after its launch. We also prepare comprehensive documentation for the solution and can bring your in-house up to speed on it if necessa
You can take advantage of Bits Orchestra’s expertise under any of these three cooperation models:
Dedicated team: Hire an autonomous team to take care of your development needs
Fixed-bid project: Get your solution within the budget and on time and benefit from predictable costs
Staff augmentation: Enhance your in-house team with the necessary specialists and scale it up and down as your needs evolve
Not sure which cooperation model suits your needs best? We can help you settle on the right one after discussing your project.
We advise you to monitor use case-specific metrics, such as training ROI or learner satisfaction for generative AI and manufacturing skills use cases. In addition to them, track AI model accuracy rates, cost-efficiency, and productivity gains. We also recommend keeping an eye on end users’ feedback.
Serhiy Sydorchuk | CTO